Tools for simplifying administration

A woman seating in front of her computer.

The Swiss Federal Council has created a number of tools and committees to simplify dealings with public administration. Here is an overview.

New regulations sometimes hurt companies by increasing their administrative burden. Switzerland has set up an efficient system for analyzing its laws to ensure that SMEs are not slowed down by a cumbersome legal framework. All draft laws and orders are reviewed before being adopted to ensure that they do not increase the administrative burden for companies. Will a new directive create excessive bureaucracy and costs for SMEs? Will it hinder the course of business in any way? Once the Federal Council and Parliament have this analysis, they use it to guide them in their decision-making.

Tools for assessing administrative burden

Switzerland uses a number of different tools to assess the potential administrative burden a new regulation will create:

  • Analysis of the Regulation's Impact (ARI). The ARI is used to assess the economic consequences of a new directive and to predict its impact on the administrative burden for companies. The analysis is carried out for draft laws and orders. It is performed by the federal office in charge of the draft legislation and is an important decision-making tool for the Federal Council and Parliament.
  • SME compatibility test. The SME Test is an additional tool for assessing how a new law will affect SMEs. It is a qualitative survey conducted by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) among a pool of about ten SMEs. The idea is to observe on the ground how the future law will affect companies' day-to-day operations. Over the past few years, SECO has conducted several dozen SME Tests in a number of areas, from waste reduction to salary statements.
  • Measuring administrative burden. Measuring administrative burden involves estimating the costs that a new regulation will create for companies. It also gives an indication as to the number of companies affected by the law. The results are based on extrapolations from company responses and estimates by specialists.
  • In the 2012, 2014 and 2018 editions of SECO's bureaucracy survey, companies were asked what they thought of the administrative burden created by regulations in different fields. In all fields combined, 67,5 % of the companies surveyed in 2018 said the administrative burden was either high or very high. In 2014, however, that figure was 66 %. The difference is not statistically significant. Companies feel the administrative burden has gotten more cumbersome globally over the past four years. 

Red Tape Monitor 2018 (only in German, French and Italian)

Committees in charge of reducing administrative burden

In addition to the tools presented above, which are mainly used to assess the consequences of new regulations, Switzerland has set up two committees tasked with making sure the authorities are actually meeting SMEs' needs in terms of administrative burden:

  • The SME Forum. Made up of company directors and other key players in the economy, the SME Forum is an extra-parliamentary committee whose aim is to defend the interests of SMEs. It is mainly involved in consultation procedures for new laws and proposes simplifications. Members of the SME Forum have direct contact with the specialists at federal offices and can communicate their concerns and suggestions to them.
  • The OCPPME (committee in charge of coordinating Swiss policy in support of small- and mid-sized companies). Implementing projects for SMEs often involves several federal departments and offices. But the various partners involved in these projects don't always have the same goals. The mission of the OCPPME is to coordinate all activities affecting SMEs and to monitor the implementation of measures for reducing administrative burden.


Last modification 05.11.2021

Top of page